Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2005-12-24 17:05:21
Size: 595
Editor: DavidAdam
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2005-12-27 20:52:19
Size: 595
Editor: 203-59-126-58
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
The theory side of this is a good grounding in the theory behind relational databases, although not that practical. The project OTOH - fat Java client backed on to MySQL - boy does it suck. Why couldn't they make us hammer nails into our eyes? It'd be less painful that making a Java GUI. And teaching all this theory about how relational databases are supposed to work and then using MySQL, which will happily and silently mutilate your data and violate referential integrity. Gah. The theory side of this is a good grounding in the theory behind relational databases, although not that practical. The project OTOH - fat Java client backed on to MySQL - boy does it suck. Why couldn't they make us hammer nails into our eyes? It'd be less painful than making a Java GUI. And teaching all this theory about how relational databases are supposed to work and then using MySQL, which will happily and silently mutilate your data and violate referential integrity. Gah.

The theory side of this is a good grounding in the theory behind relational databases, although not that practical. The project OTOH - fat Java client backed on to MySQL - boy does it suck. Why couldn't they make us hammer nails into our eyes? It'd be less painful than making a Java GUI. And teaching all this theory about how relational databases are supposed to work and then using MySQL, which will happily and silently mutilate your data and violate referential integrity. Gah.

Taken by ChiPingTsang in the past.

[http://units.uwa.edu.au/CITS3240 Handbook link]


CategoryUnits