|
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2009-12-20 10:38:32
Size: 1019
Comment:
|
Size: 1140
Comment: thigns
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 33: | Line 33: |
| Does anyone use their personal mail server to send mail with a UCC from address? Gmail doesn't matter because that uses the Sender header and a sensible envelope header. | Does anyone use their personal or ISP mail server to send mail with a UCC from address? Gmail doesn't matter because that uses the Sender header and a sensible envelope header. Mailman overwrites Sender from Gmail. We should publish instructions on how to do SMTP AUTH to UCC regardless. |
It is probably a good idea to start implementing some of the antispam tools usable by domains; e.g. DKIM, SPF.
DKIM
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys_Identified_Mail]
Gmail signs all its outgoing mail with DKIM.
Incoming
Checking DKIM on incoming messages? Job of MTA or MUA?
Mailman breaking existing signatures
Outgoing
There's a few milters, need to pick one.
SPF
SPF seems a bit more likely to cause Issues. None of the big providers seem to have hard FAIL policies yet.
Incoming
Do we want to add verification checks to incoming mail? Does it matter? Would have to be on ext-mx only (or maybe whitelist 130.95/16).
Outgoing
No mail goes out RESNET, so could publish 130.95/16 with SOFTFAIL (or even hard FAIL?)
Should we start doing SRS on .forward files?
Does anyone use their personal or ISP mail server to send mail with a UCC from address? Gmail doesn't matter because that uses the Sender header and a sensible envelope header. Mailman overwrites Sender from Gmail.
We should publish instructions on how to do SMTP AUTH to UCC regardless.
